ALBANY—At least one Democratic state senator is still hopeful about reaching a consensus with the wayward Gang of Three, even as a report claims State Senator Malcolm Smith is looking beyond the three to cobble together a 32-vote majority.
Smith announced last week that he was suspending negotiations with the trio after earlier announcing he had brokered a deal. He is now reported to be looking more intently across the aisle.
State Senator Eric Adams, a Brooklyn Democrat, said he counts two of the rogues - State Senator Carl Kruger and State Senator Ruben Diaz Sr. - as friends.
"I want them in the party, I want them in the conference, that's my position," Adams told me this morning after leaving an event on reforming the Electoral College. "We need everyone in the room because it's important to have each part of the opinions of the electorate represented. They're still Democrats. Democrats are a group of diverse opinions."
Adams said he has been talking to Kruger and Diaz and will continue to do so. Pedro Espada Jr., the third member of the trio, said publicly that he will not vote for Smith, who he called a "scoundrel and a liar."
Also at the event this morning was State Senator Antoine Thompson, of Buffalo. I asked him for his thoughts on an upstate caucus proposed by State Senator Joe Robach, a Republican.
"It's a little late, don't you think?" Thompson said. I asked him if he believed a regional caucus could become a force across party lines. "In time," he said. "But I think we need to get the Democratic upstate caucus up and running first."
I asked him about support for Smith. "We're one New York," he replied.
Sarah Palin is a living, breathing Rorschach test. It doesn’t really matter what she says or does: her fans and critics will see whatever they ... >
The new Board of Education that Michael Bloomberg assembled may be his own worst enemy in restoring mayoral control of the city's schools, critics ... >
If Americans hope to discuss health care, climate change, green economics or public infrastructure with any degree of realism, then the time has ... >
There’s a common tactic that accompanies most development fights: packing a public hearing.
Usually this is carried out by a variety of ... >
Democrats stopping the Discussion...
I am a indignant of the posturing of these 3 Senators. I have no problem that they are against Gay Marriage, I have no issue that they vote against it, BUT TO THINK THEY CAN STOP THE DISCUSSION - STOP IT COMING TO THE FLOOR... this is not democracy, this is not representing their constituents equally. We need to remind these Senators (or Senator-elect) what their job title is.
I am Trader and not prone to "activism", but the position of these 3 Senators have sparked it. I have put signs up in my car asking why they cannot respect a Senate Floor Discussion, oh, I forgot... they want a different Majority Speaker. Is anyone else indignant! Gay Marriage is also about removing the stigma... in Brooklyn the Latin guy was beaten TO DEATH BECAUSE HE APPEARED to be gay.
And these Senators want to push the issue away in order to not elect Mr. Smith as speaker... do i need to draw any more lines to this unacceptable position?
Not only should we write about our disagreement, but damn, I am going to visit their office and ask myself....
Post new comment