ALBANY—David Paterson's new budget totals $121.1 billion, including deficit-bridging measures of $1.7 billion for the remainder of the current fiscal year (until April), and $13.7 billion for the 2009 budget year.
A couple of notable cuts:
-- An 18 percent tax on soft drinks that contain less than 70 percent natural fruit juice. It is expected to raise $404 million.
-- School aid will be reduced by 3.3 percent, or $698 million. No cuts are have been ordered for the current school year.
-- The STAR rebate program will be eliminated at a savings of $1.4 billion. Property tax exemptions under the program remain.
-- Agency consolidations will require 521 layoffs. The workforce is expected to decrease by 3,108 through attrition and other means. Public employees are also asked to forgo a scheduled three percent raise and to "lag" paychecks by five days--both proposals introduced earlier. It is estimated to save $368 million.
-- Eliminate $328 million in aid to New York City, and freeze it for other cities around the state.
-- Reinstate tax on clothing under $110, raising $462 million.
-- Increase the cigar tax by 17 cents, raising $10 million.
-- There are 17 pages of "revenue actions." They include increasing the fee for registering a car from $44 to $55, driver's license renewal from $50 to $62.50 and food licensing fees from $200 to $400 for processors and warehouses. The actions are expected to raise $2.2 billion.
-- Trim $3.5 billion from health care programs through fraud prevention, controlling growth and reimbursement to nursing homes.
Jerry Brown’s career serves as a four-decade testament to the idea that politics is a means to a means. Every time he gains an office, he almost ... >
The new Board of Education that Michael Bloomberg assembled may be his own worst enemy in restoring mayoral control of the city's schools, critics ... >
If Americans hope to discuss health care, climate change, green economics or public infrastructure with any degree of realism, then the time has ... >
There’s a common tactic that accompanies most development fights: packing a public hearing.
Usually this is carried out by a variety of ... >
Taxing clothing is pretty
Taxing clothing is pretty much a below the belt tactic that is really spiteful. If the budget needs to raise money there are plenty other ways to do it and not hurt ordinary people who need to clothe themselves and never mind find the money to be able to afford their children's clothes for heavens sake. Sometimes I wonder what goes through the minds of the policymakers.
Sure, stick double or even triple the amount on tobacco as its not a necessity and let those who are too stupid to quit (and there is no other way to phrase that) pay for the people who need to clothe their children.
Post new comment