December 16, 2008 - 10:30am
News

First Look at the Budget: Cigar Tax Up, City Aid Way Down

Jimmy Vielkind
Bedtime reading material.

ALBANY—David Paterson's new budget totals $121.1 billion, including deficit-bridging measures of $1.7 billion for the remainder of the current fiscal year (until April), and $13.7 billion for the 2009 budget year.

A couple of notable cuts:

-- An 18 percent tax on soft drinks that contain less than 70 percent natural fruit juice. It is expected to raise $404 million.

-- School aid will be reduced by 3.3 percent, or $698 million. No cuts are have been ordered for the current school year.

-- The STAR rebate program will be eliminated at a savings of $1.4 billion. Property tax exemptions under the program remain.

-- Agency consolidations will require 521 layoffs. The workforce is expected to decrease by 3,108 through attrition and other means. Public employees are also asked to forgo a scheduled three percent raise and to "lag" paychecks by five days--both proposals introduced earlier. It is estimated to save $368 million.

-- Eliminate $328 million in aid to New York City, and freeze it for other cities around the state.

-- Reinstate tax on clothing under $110, raising $462 million.

-- Increase the cigar tax by 17 cents, raising $10 million.

-- There are 17 pages of "revenue actions." They include increasing the fee for registering a car from $44 to $55, driver's license renewal from $50 to $62.50 and food licensing fees from $200 to $400 for processors and warehouses. The actions are expected to raise $2.2 billion.

-- Trim $3.5 billion from health care programs through fraud prevention, controlling growth and reimbursement to nursing homes.

Jimmy Vielkind can be reached via email at jimmy.vielkind@politickerny.com.

Comments

Taxing clothing is pretty


Taxing clothing is pretty much a below the belt tactic that is really spiteful. If the budget needs to raise money there are plenty other ways to do it and not hurt ordinary people who need to clothe themselves and never mind find the money to be able to afford their children's clothes for heavens sake. Sometimes I wonder what goes through the minds of the policymakers.

Sure, stick double or even triple the amount on tobacco as its not a necessity and let those who are too stupid to quit (and there is no other way to phrase that) pay for the people who need to clothe their children.

01/14/09 6:02 am

Post new comment

The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.
  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.
  • Allowed HTML tags: <a> <em> <strong> <cite> <code> <ul> <ol> <li> <dl> <dt> <dd> <blockquote> <b> <i> <p> <br> <span> <s> <img> <h1> <h2> <h3> <h4> <h5> <h6>
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.
  • Images can be added to this post.

More information about formatting options

CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Image CAPTCHA
Copy the characters (respecting upper/lower case) from the image.