October 22, 2008 - 1:47pm
News

Yassky, Gerson, Brewer Offer Amendment, Deny It's a 'Fig Leaf'

City Hall: nyc.govCity Hall: nyc.govThree undecided City Council members—David Yassky, Gale Brewer and Alan Gerson—told reporters just now they’ll introduce an amendment to the term-limits legislation that would establish a charter review commission that could put term-limits to a voter referendum at the earliest opportunity.

The Council votes on the legislation tomorrow; the three lawmakers, who were previously undecided about how they will vote, declined to say whether they’ll support the bill in its current form.

All three said they believe it's better policy to allow city lawakers to serve three terms, instead of only two, but expressed reservations about overturning two public referendums with legislation in the City Council.

When asked if this amendment was simply a “fig leaf” to give them political cover with voters, all three shook their heads, and Yassky, said, “Absolutely not.” He went on, “I think that the right outcome is to change term limits from eight [years in total] to 12. I say that without hesitation. That’s in the best interest of this city.” But, Yassky added, “This is not a good way to do it.”

“We have to recognize there are conflicting and competing Democratic principles,” said Gerson, of Manhattan, motioning as if he was juggling. Constituents “want the option of voting for continuity,” he said, and “a large number of people don’t want to be bound by what happened twelve years ago."

The three spoke to reporters on the steps of City Hall for about 30 minutes. As they spoke, Michael Bloomberg, who according to Gerson “blocked” a move to put term limits on a ballot before voters this year, walked by without saying a word.

A Bloomberg spokesman monitoring the press conference did not immediately say where the mayor, who has no public events today, was going.

Azi Paybarah can be reached via email at azi.paybarah@politickerny.com.

Comments

Gerson talking gibberish


Sorry, Gerson, there aren't "conflicting and competing Democratic principles" in this issue. Nearly 90% of New Yorkers polled by Quinnipiac oppose overturning term limits by legislation.

So voters don't want the "option of voting for continuity." They just want the option of voting on term limits -- period.

And the "large number of people" who "don't want to be bound by what happened twelve years ago?"

That would be billionaires Bloomberg, Lauder, Zuckerman, Kravis and Speyer.

Ninety percent of the rest of us want to vote in a referendum on term limits.

Stop talking gibberish. Your proposed amendment does nothing different than what Bloomberg promised Lauder.

Gerson, Yassky, Brewer: Get off the fence. Do the right thing and oppose the Bloomberg/Quinn bill.

10/22/08 3:19 pm

Post new comment

The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.
  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.
  • Allowed HTML tags: <a> <em> <strong> <cite> <code> <ul> <ol> <li> <dl> <dt> <dd> <blockquote> <b> <i> <p> <br> <span> <s> <img> <h1> <h2> <h3> <h4> <h5> <h6>
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.
  • Images can be added to this post.

More information about formatting options

CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Image CAPTCHA
Copy the characters (respecting upper/lower case) from the image.